Tag Archives: latin america

Deport the tired, the poor

Article: Hagan, Jacqueline, Karl Eschbach, and Nestor Rodriguez. 2008. “U.S. Deportation Policy, Family Separation, and Circular Migration.” International Migration Review 42(1): 64-88.

Summary:

Stringent immigration laws and increasing deportation of non-citizens may have many more social consequences than Americans realize—just ask the deportees.

Over the past two decades the U.S. has passed a series of immigration reforms that make it easier and quicker to deport noncitizens, increasing the number of deportees from 40,000 a year in the early 1990s to 208,000 in 2005. To understand the effect of increasing deportation, Hagan, Eschbach, and Rodriguez (International Migration Review 2008) draw on a random sample of 300 Salvadoran deportees in their home communities. They find current U.S. immigration policy pose dire social costs for deportees and their families.

Other than the obvious psychological costs of leaving long-established family and work ties, many deportees also noted the financial burden placed on their families. On the one hand, deportees are likely to have families and dependents in the U.S. Since 95% of deportees are male, this takes away the main breadwinner from the family and may lead to a greater reliance on the state. On the other hand, 72% of deportees remit to extended family (especially parents) in El Salvador. Remittances in the small isthmus nation surpass national exports as a source of foreign exchange and many families rely on the cash flow for survival. When noncitizens are deported, they put both families in jeopardy.

While contention over immigration will not be solved anytime soon, it would serve us well to remember Emma Lazarus’ words inscribed on the statue of liberty, “Give me your tired, your poor…”

Does Money Whiten?

Article: Schwartzman, Luisa Farah. “Does Money Whiten?” American Sociological Review. , December 2007.

Summary: So does money whiten in Brazil? In a word, Schwartzman argues yes. This is for two reasons. First, more educated nonwhite parents are more likely to marry white and less likely to marry nonwhites. Second, more-educated interracial couples label their children white more often than do less-educated interracial couples.

The most interesting aspect of this article in my opinion is the structural buffer the upper-class, and especially the white upper-class, has erected. As the author notes, “By maintaining rigid class boundaries with poor nonwhites (by both marrying within their social class and imposing restraints on upward mobility of nonwhites…), the white elite isolates itself from nonwhites and imposes its standards (and incorporates into its families) the few nonwhites who share their elite status. For the same reason, nonwhites who move up are not able to break the system of racial hierarchy in the long run, because their children are often incorporated into the white group.” 958-9

***It is important to note that, in Brazil, educational attainment is a proxy for socio-economic status as we understand it in the U.S. Therefore, the dependent variable used by Schwartzman is parent education.