• about
  • rss
  • youtube channel
  • submit image
  • more

AXE SHOWER GEL TOUGHENS UP THE ISRAELI ARMY!

Dubi sent in a link to Axe shower gel’s website for the Israeli market. Click on the Hebrew text on the lower right of the flag stand to see a video (sorry, I can’t embed it). I assure, you, even if you don’t speak Hebrew (I don’t), you’ll get the general message, and it’s totally worth viewing.

I’m quoting Dubi’s email at length, since it sums up the aspects of the video we non-Hebrew-speakers won’t quite get (though, again, I think the overall theme came through just fine):

This is the new campaign for Axe Shower Gel in Israel. It obviously targets the soldier demographic (military service is compulsory in Israel, and most secular Jews 18-21 years old are in active duty), and generally makes use of Israel’s militaristic ethos. The movie tells the story of a “secret unit” of the Israeli Defense Forces - the cheerleading squad. As you can easily tell, they are depicted as feminine, weak, and ludicrous. The younger woman “interviewed” is the commander of the unit (ha! a woman commanding men. How funny is that? Actually, female commanders of male units, especially during basic training but not only [then], are common in the IDF). The older woman in the white doctor’s coat is the unit’s KABAN, an acronym for the (real) position of a Mental Health Officer. This particular Kaban (sporting a heavy eastern European…accent) explains that “there’s nothing wrong mentally with these soldiers. The only problem is they use their mother’s soap, and that makes them feminine”. The reporter shown later on asks “how do you prefer to face the enemy, with a hand-grenade, or with pom-poms?”…The highly subtle slogan for the campaign is: “Soldier, mom’s soap makes you feminine. Change to a men’s soap!”.

Dubi pretty much sums it up: using female products makes men weak, and we know they’re weak because they engage in feminized activities like cheerleading. And they let a woman (a hot, blonde woman at that!) be in charge and tell them what to do! Only in a crazy, de-masculinized, upside-down world would such a thing happen! And, of course, weak men make a weak military, which means they might not be able to beat the (Arab) enemy.

Notice that at the end of the video, it ends with a shot of the soldiers standing in formation with their pom-poms, backed by a tank that has its guns stuffed with what appear to be flowers (roses?). I don’t know if flowers sticking out of the barrels of guns has the same association with the peace movement in Israel as it does the U.S. (where it is an image widely connected to the 1960s anti-war movement); if so, it appears that an anti-war stance is also being feminized here.

I wonder what female IMF unit commanders think when they see this video (if they do), which says that their position of authority is a sign of an emasculated, weak force? Maybe they find it funny or don’t care at all. I dunno.

Awesome find, Dubi!

GHETTOPOLY AND REDNECKOPOLY: FUN WITH STEREOTYPES?

Elia B.  and Krystal-lynn brought my attention to the game Ghettopoly, a game obviously based on Monopoly (but totally unrelated to the Hasbro company); it was sold at Urban Outfitters in 2003. The game brings up some questions about humor, particularly humor based on stereotypes.

Found at MonopolyCollector.com.

The game includes the following pieces (list found here):

Here’s a screenshot of some of the things on the list:

According to this CNN story, the creator of the game had this response to critics of the game:

“It draws on stereotypes not as a means to degrade, but as a medium to bring together in laughter,” Chang maintains, adding, “If we can’t laugh at ourselves … we’ll continue to live in blame and bitterness.”

Chang also created Redneckopoly:

The game includes:

Images from the game (found here):

Ok, I’m from Oklahoma, and specifically from a family that most of you would probably define as “redneck,” but I’m not sure I understand the “piece of crap” token. Is it because rednecks presumably say things are a “piece of crap” a lot? My family uses the phrase a lot, but I wasn’t aware of this being a stereotypical redneck thing. Or is it just a symbol of the fact that everything rednecks own is a piece of crap? I’m confused!

Both versions of the game were pulled from the shelves after Hasbro sued for copyright infringement. And while there was a lot of criticism of the Ghettopoly game, there doesn’t seem to have been nearly as much concern about Redneckopoly (I did find some links to articles criticizing it, but there were way more for Ghettopoly).

Chang argues that he is not spreading stereotypes, he’s making fun of them, and that it’s not his problem if there are people who can’t tell the difference.

What do you think?

For other posts about racial humor, see here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

Thanks, Elia and Krystal-lynn!

ASSERTIVE WOMEN AS BITCHES

This cartoonist illustrates the way in which assertive or aggressive behavior by men and women is perceived as competence or bitchiness respectively.  In reversing the reactions (it’s “Opposite World” after all), the absurdity of the sexist reaction is exposed.

Found here via Feministing.

X-TREME SANITARY PROTECTION

Ii think this ad for Kotex is using the X-TREME meme to sell pads (found here):

The copy reads:

It’s got a million micro cells that say your heavy days are goin’ down.

Three words… bring it on.  Always Infinity can take it.  It’s the world’s first pad of its kind.  Packed with an uber-absorbent material called Infinicel that has the power to hold 10x its weight.  Which means you just kicked the heavy out of heavy days.

Um, “goin’ down,” “bring it on,” “uber-absorbent,” “kicked the heavy”?  They even have an “x” in there.  Not to mention the whole floating in a circle of light thing.

TARGET WOMEN: CARS

The ever-fantastic Sarah Haskins on car ads aimed at women:

For other examples of marketing cars to women, see here, here, here, here, here, and here.

REPLACING WOMEN

Vintage Ads posted these three ads–one for an electric refrigerator and two for Gold Dust Cleaner–that compare the product to a Black servant. 

The copy in the refrigerator ad reads: “And So Electricity Is Made The Willing Servant.”  The accompanying image includes three white women looking leisurely and a Black servant. 

Similarly, these two Gold Dust ads personify the product as Black twin babies. The motto is: “Let the GOLD DUST TWINS do your work.” 

I think these are fascinating in that they draw our attention to whose work technology is designed to replace. Earlier on this blog we’ve talked about how ads have offered to replace women’s work with the market and with technology.  In these cases, the market and technology were needed to ease women’s workload (they certainly couldn’t expect their husbands to do it).  In this case, Black servants serve to take women one step further from ”women’s work.”  Instead of replacing women themselves, the product replace the servants who replaced women, making the comparison of the product to Black servants completely sensical at the time.

THE HAZARDS OF HISTORICAL AMNESIA (BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE IS TOO DISTURBING)

This “Christmas Cross” is sold by the American Family Association (via The Daily Dish):

CONTROVERSY OVER “BLASPHEMOUS” ITALIAN ANTI-RAPE POSTER

Telefono Donna, a rape crisis hotline in Italy, designed a poster to raise awareness of rape in honor of November 25, the International Day to for the Elimination of Violence Against Women. Some conservative politicians in Milan object to the Christ-like pose taken by the bare-breasted model in the poster. From the UK Telegraph:

“We’re calling for the poster to be withdrawn because an important day like this should not be debased by such a sexual provocation,” said councillor Carlo Fidanza, a member of the right-wing National Alliance party.

But the president of the Telefono Donna rape helpline, Stefania Bartochetti, said she was surprised by the controversy because the poster had raised no objections in other Italian cities.

“As a Catholic I can’t see anything offensive or blasphemous. We chose a strong image to encourage more rape victims to break their silence,” she said.

The poster poses the question: ‘Who Pays For Man’s Sins?’ and a caption which reads “Only four per cent of women who suffer sexual violence report their assailants.”

Left-leaning politicians said their opponents’ concerns were out of step with contemporary Italian society.

“If you applied these standards to Italian television, you’d have to get rid of 70 per cent of what the main channels broadcast,” said Pierfrancesco Majorino, of the Democratic Party.

Small reproduction of the poster, showing bare-breasted woman [NSFW], below the cut. Read More »

“ORGASM FACE”: BE SURE YOU DON’T TURN HIM OFF!

Brianna S. mentioned to me that the December issue of Cosmo has an article about about whether you’re making an attractive face when you orgasm. I googled “Cosmo make face orgasm,” and found an image of the cover (notice the big “Your Orgasm Face” tagline next to one of Jessica Simpson’s boobs) and a discussion of the article at Jezebel:

The implication (”What he’s thinking when he sees it”), of course, is that if you’re not careful, you might make an unattractive face while you orgasm, and that your male partner (because who cares what women’s female partners think?) will be put off by it. It’s female orgasm as performance. Cosmo is reminding us, in case we forgot, that a woman’s sexual pleasure isn’t really about her. Even while having an orgasm, she needs to be sure she looks attractive.

I can’t help but think that if you’re anxiously trying to monitor your facial expression, it might get in the way of you getting to have an orgasm at all. I wonder which would be preferable, then: having a real orgasm but with an ugly orgasm face, or faking an orgasm but making sure your face is under control.

Oddly, the cover story would appear to contradict the results of Cosmo’s own poll (very scientific, I’m sure!) of men, in which they seem to wish that women would worry less about their bodies:

What self-conscious thing will a girl sometimes do that ruins the mood?
29% Refuse to let me see her with the lights on

“Trust me — if I’m with you, I already think you’re beautiful.” —Randall, 24
28% Ask if she looks fat
27% Put down her body/sex skills
16% Hide her body with the sheet

This is an excellent example of the ridiculously contradictory messages women’s magazines often give to women: love yourself as you are, but here’s a diet plan to help you be a better you! Be independent, but be sure you have a boyfriend at all times! Your boyfriend really loves you as you are, but OMG, what if you look ugly while you (insert activity here) and he secretly thinks you’re digusting?

Thanks, Brianna!

GWEN STEFANI’S HARAJUKU GIRLS

Breck C. sent us this link to a collection of photographs of Harajuku Girls.  Harajuku is a style for teenagers in a region of Japan (here is the wikipedia entry).  I can’t think of a way to describe them that does them justice, so here are some pictures (found here, here, here and here):

In 2004, Gwen Stefani began touring with four women posing as Japanese Harajuku girls.  Stefani’s Harajuku Girls serve as her entourage and back-up dancers. Here she is with four (Japanese?) women that she hires to be her Harajuku Girls (found here and here):

Stefani also has a Harajuku Lovers clothing line and a series of perfumes, one for her, and one for each Harajuku Girl:

I think that Stefani’s use of Asian women as props (they may or may not be Japanese) fetishizes Asian women and reinforces white privilege.  The Harajuku Girls serve as contrast to Stefani’s performance of ideal white femininity.  It makes me think of both this poster on colonial-era travel and this fashion spread.

Yet, Stefani’s been at this for four years and I can’t remember hearing any objections to her Harajuku Girls, even in feminist and anti-racist alternative media.  Further, if her fashion line, perfume, and continued employment of the Harajuku Girls are any indication, people seem to think the whole thing is awesome.  In the meantime, I bet she’s making bank on her clothing line and perfume.  Where’s that money going?

Do you think my reading is fair?

And, if so, why do you think there’s been so little outcry?

For good measure, here she is performing with her “Girls”:

YouTube Preview Image