• about
  • rss
  • youtube channel
  • submit image
  • more

HOW TO DO MASCULINITY

Maybe you’ve never noticed, given that feminists are always talking about the ladies, that there are lots and lots and lots of things that (real) men are not supposed to do. For instance: drink fruity drinks, wear pink shoes, look at their fingernails the wrong way, enjoy a “chick flick,” like a girl, like cats, prefer not to fight, care about grades, eat salad… should I go on? You get the gist.

Comparably, women have got it good. We’re allowed to knit and play soccer, be a mom and be a lawyer, take dance and karate, wear skirts and pants!

How do we make sense of this? Crash course: Femininity is just for chicks. When men do feminine things, they are debasing themselves. Masculinity is awesome and for everyone. When women do masculine things, they’re awesome. This is sexism: Masculinity rules, femininity drools. Men are encouraged to stay away from femininity, so their individual choices are constrained, but they also are staying away from something debasing. In contrast, women are required to do a least some femininity, so women are required to debase themselves, at least a little bit, even as they are given more options.

I say this all to introduce these two hilarious examples of men and how they have to worry about doing masculinity (sent in by Vesko J.).

How To Give The Perfect Man Hug

How I Sit On The Bus

Also, you should watch this one. You’ll see why.

Bookmark and Share

12 Comments

  1. Posted June 26, 2008 at 10:52 am | Permalink

    I think you’re way off there. It’s not that masculinity is awesome and femininity debasing. It’s not about women and men, actually. It’s about gays. Most men have a mortal fear of being thought of as gay. Let’s take me for example - I’m your regular run of the mill have-no-problem-whatsoever-with-gays-but-petrified-at-the-thought-of-being-thought-of-as-gay liberal kinda guy. I have a sincere aversion to wearing pink, to giggling and to a bunch of other stuff that is associated (stereotypically, of course) with both women and gays. I do not, however, have any problem with a variety of motherly-chores related to my son, even though those are equally associated with women. The thing is - they’re not associated with gays, because children in general are associated with hetero families. So by being the boy’s mother for a while, while I’m certainly not asserting my masculinity, I am most assuredly asserting my heterosexuality, and therefore have no problem with it. I think you’ll find this is applicable to most liberal heterosexual men.

    So, to sum up, what’s “debasing” is not femininity, but “gaiety”. Which means I’m still a jerk, but at least I’m no chauvinist.

  2. Charli
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Dubi - aren’t gay men stereotyped as “effeminate” or “feminine?” They “lose” their masculinity by not participating in a heterosexual relationship, or by picking up certain feminine traits. I think that it comes right back around to the feminine being the “lesser” of the two characteristics. Men who are scared of being thought of as gay are scared of being seen as less of a “real man” since gay men are associated (whether correctly or incorrectly) with feminine behaviors (like leg crossing, having an interest in clothing or hair, or chick flicks).

  3. Twinsen
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 5:00 pm | Permalink

    @Dubi:

    Lesbians are having sex with the correct object for sex - another woman. That’s why their existence is not such a problem.

    Gays are having sex not with the correct object (a woman), but with another human being (a man), which is degrading. A human, that voluntarily humiliates himself to go into the “passive” position in sex, reserved only for women. Yuck.

    So, you think that gay disgust has nothing to do with female being inferior? Think again.

  4. Posted June 26, 2008 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    I disagree, Charli. I gave an example of a clear feminine characteristic: motherhood(ness?), that men are less likely to feel embarrassed about than anything that would make them look gay. I remember a long time ago it was considered a “code” for being gay to wear an earring on a specific ear (left?). While it was, at the time, considered completely OK for men to wear earrings (at least where I lived), it was considered highly embarrassing to wear one on the (left?) ear, for fear of being misidentified as gay.

  5. Posted June 26, 2008 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    Twinsen - I don’t think that gays are degraded, debased or disgusting. I just don’t want people to think I’m one. Furthermore, it doesn’t humiliate me when people do think I’m gay, it just makes me panic and put on a real whoa-there-fella-I’m-a-boobs-kinda-guy face.

    Oh, and gimme a break with the “human being (a man)” bullshit. Of all the people I know, chauvinists included, nobody today thinks women are not “real human beings”.

  6. Twinsen
    Posted June 27, 2008 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    A girl can hug a girl without this being sexual. But for men, it is.
    It’s not disgusting, OK, it’s just “scary”. The question is: why do you panic? What is so terrible?

  7. Posted September 25, 2008 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    The idea that women should be masculine is, in my opinion, a feminist institution. I don’t know any men who expect women to be masculine.

  8. E.M.
    Posted November 24, 2008 at 9:26 am | Permalink

    See this is the thing, it (gender relation issues) isn’t a problem you usually seen on a small level. Most people really are generous enough to not make harsh judgement on someone they see who is not strictly in keeping with female vs male roles. Few people looks at a girl and say, “she not a human,” because that pretty obviously contrary to the truth. It is the entirety of femininity that is considered ‘not human’. But when I say ‘human’ what is meant is ‘the acceptable mode’.

    In short, it’s not that individuals are saying women are to be reviled (anymore), it’s that societal constructs (everything from language to our banking system, to fashion) is sending the message ‘femininity is only to be displayed by these certain people at these certain acceptable times’

  9. E.M.
    Posted November 24, 2008 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    Charli, I have to dispute your ‘feminist construct’ comment. I think there was a surge during second wave, 1960s style feminists, of groups that had the idea that women should act like men to the extent that they themselves need to eschew feminine traits, although not all feminist groups at the time supported that idea (the artist Judy Chicago being a prominent one). Anyway, third wave, contemporary, feminists groups (who still differ on many subjects) rarely support that to be a feminist you should act masculine.

    I would really strongly argue that the idea of ‘women should act masculine’ actually comes from women just looking around, seeing where the power is (in what jobs, in what behaviors, in what dress) and saying, ‘hey, a,b and c are traits of powerful people, I will a,b and c too.’

  10. Asada
    Posted December 6, 2008 at 12:23 am | Permalink

    @ twinsen
    new flash
    women are humans.

  11. Vesko J
    Posted March 10, 2009 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    Since the clip for hugging no longer works, here’s a more direct link to it:

    http://www.videojug.com/film/how-to-give-a-great-man-to-man-hug

  12. Ranah
    Posted March 10, 2009 at 6:46 pm | Permalink

    The link to the “hug” video no longer works, so here’s another one:

    http://www.videojug.com/film/how-to-give-a-great-man-to-man-hug

7 Trackbacks

  1. [...] that’s what the feminist movement is - respect for persons regardless of gender - taking that idea and labeling with one gender - *femin*ism - strikes me as [...]

  2. By Sociological Images » RE-DEFINING MASCULINITY on July 10, 2008 at 5:45 pm

    [...] men if they are not stereotypically masculine (i.e, men should not know about ballet, hug or sit improperly, drink the wrong drink, go to the bathroom together, smell like flowers, or eat tofu), this ad [...]

  3. [...] a previous post I argued that sexism constrains men’s lives by making all things coded feminine off-limits [...]

  4. [...] Elsewhere on this blog I have commented about how the gender rules for men’s daily lives are more strict than for women because of androcentrism (a version of sexism in which masculinity is valued more than femininity). Yesterday, CNN reported on a school in Ohio that has told a 13-year-old boy he is not allowed to do what 13-year-old girls do everyday: wear make-up (hat tip to Jezebel): [...]

  5. [...] equally awesome when men cry, wear skirts, learn to knit, or become interior designers.   Here is my crash course on [...]

  6. By Sociological Images » BUY HER DIAMONDS OR ELSE on December 8, 2008 at 4:05 am

    [...] another example of androcentrism (see here, here, here, and here), one that is nicely combined with the representation of women as annoying [...]

  7. [...] other examples of antrocentrism, see our posts here, here, here, here, here, and here.  See also this post on [...]

Post a Comment