• about
  • rss
  • youtube channel
  • submit image
  • more

GENDER ILLOGIC IN A BIRTH CONTROL COMMERCIAL

Unlike men, who are supposed to reject all things feminine, women are encouraged to balance masculine and feminine characteristics. In this commercial for a birth control pill on which you have only four periods a year, a woman’s masculine and feminine side are personified by her “logical” and her “emotional” self respectively. After the video are two commentaries: one by me and one by Gwen.

Lisa says: The gender symbolism in this ad is out-of-control. Of course emotion and logic are, themselves, gendered concepts. We think of women as the emotional sex and men as the logical sex. But there is so much more! The emotional side of the woman is surrounded by turquoise, with a long necklace, and a belted top that is almost frilly. Her logical side is wearing a brown shirt with angular argyle shapes, surrounded by sleek white and, instead of a necklace, has a crisp angular men’s shirt collar. While her “emotional” self dances around, kicks the ball playfully, and lounges in a round chair, her “logical” self does research on the internet, stops the ball’s frivolous rolling, and sits up straight in a square (again angular) chair. The advertisers are working very hard to get across that this woman has two “opposite” sides that correspond to our stereotypes about “opposite” sexes.

I’d also like to point out, for the record, that emotion and logic are not opposites. The opposite of emotional would be unemotional and the opposite of logical, illogical. It is not impossible to think straight about things that we care about. We only think that they’re opposites because they are attached to femininity and masculinity and we think those are opposites. In fact, we are so committed to their opposite-ness that it affects how we think about ideas that become related. Amazing.

Gwen says: As Lisa pointed out, the ad posits emotion and logic as opposites–emotion is fun and carefree, logic is stodgy. But when it comes to birth control, we’re supposed to make our decisions using emotion, not logic. WTF? It’s the emotional side convincing the logical side to take Seasonique. In fact, rather than worry about it ourselves, we learn that we can just ask someone else who is, of course, logical: a doctor. I’m sure activists who have encouraged women to take more control over their reproductive health will be thrilled.

And by the end logic is satisfied and the two halves merge…but not into a person who has both logic and emotion. No, logic disappears altogether; only emotion is left. Because that’s how women are: we pull out our logic now and again when we really need it (or, in this case, think we need it), but the rest of the time we rely entirely on emotion.

Honestly, I am so confused by this marketing technique. If they were going to separate logic and emotion, I would have expected it to be a woman “illogically” (that is, emotionally) fearing something “unnatural” or new that she perceives as risky, and the logical side using the internet and having her emotional side talk to a doctor to reassure her pretty little head that there’s nothing to be afraid of. Telling women to let emotion guide logic when it comes to taking medications or making health decisions is an, um, interesting tactic I never would have thought of.

All that is aside from the fact that, in addition to the four periods a year, apparently you can also have bleeding at unexpected times the rest of the year. In fact, some of that bleeding might be as heavy as a period. But it’s not! Even if it’s as heavy as a period, it is not a period! It’s just irregular bleeding! Which sounds WAY BETTER. I suppose I could provide some commentary on why birth control pills that purport to save women from having their periods are such a big thing and how this plays into our ideas of menstruation as a “curse.” But it’s 7:03 a.m. and I don’t feel like it.

8 Comments

  1. Muriel Minnie Mae
    Posted July 11, 2008 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    What this commercial also doesn’t mention is once you start taking this pill, the logical side will be overwhelmed by the synthetic hormones, thus the emotional side will take over leaving the “whole” individual” a weepy, despondent, mood-swingy mess.

    Or, at least that’s what happens when I take artificial hormones.

  2. Posted July 11, 2008 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    If this ad is not a parody, because it sure seems like one, people should make a parody soon.

    I want to point out also that this ad could be worse. What if they depict the emotional side more like Brendan Fraser in Bedazzled? You know, when he wants to be more in touch of his feelings.

    For all I saw, the emotional side could be as well named the “childish or playlish” side. I don’t really know what does dancing have to do with being emotional but I might be biased (my rational side prevails lol)

  3. Anonymous
    Posted July 11, 2008 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    What I’m most confused about with this commercial is how they divided the rational/emotional. If we line male up with rational and female up with emotional, then we get some weird stuff. They must’ve had some serious problems trying to think through this when designing the commercial. (Or perhaps not, which could also explain things.)

    Birth control is supposed to be the woman’s responsibility, but how can an “emotional” woman be trusted to make such an important decision? You would think that, instead, the decision would require a “rational” thinker like a man. But, since birth control is not the man’s job, they had to find some way to keep it in the woman’s domain. Ta da! The emotional/woman is the smart one in this case…for rational reasons. (Huh?)

    Perhaps the power of Seasonale is that its science can convince the flighty emotional/woman to such an extent that *she* can convince the stoic rational/man side to take it. Or maybe that’s why the doctor is needed — the emotional/woman can’t be trusted to make an informed decision, so it must be made for her?

  4. Edith OSB
    Posted July 11, 2008 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    What’s amazing to me is the voice-over character who describes at high speed the serious side effects of blood clots etc. If the woman were using her logical side, those side effects and the other negative - the lack of protection against HIV and other STDs - would be part of the picture. Of course, giving serious consideration to those issues wouldn’t help sell the product.

  5. Interrobang
    Posted July 11, 2008 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    What this commercial also doesn’t mention is once you start taking this pill, the logical side will be overwhelmed by the synthetic hormones, thus the emotional side will take over leaving the “whole” individual” a weepy, despondent, mood-swingy mess.

    Speak for yourself. I’m much more stable when I’m on HCs than when I’m not because my hormones aren’t swinging up and down like they’re trying to be the Pirate Ship at the local fair. Personally, given how many different kinds of pills I had to try before finding one that really worked well, maybe you just didn’t find the right kind. I wasn’t going to give up on it, though, because even being a weepy, despondent mess every so often is better than having cramps that could stun an elephant, bleeding that leaves me anemic, periods that arrive when they feel like it and not on any sort of schedule, and spending two or three days in bed throwing up when they do…

    I love HCs.

  6. Anonymous
    Posted July 11, 2008 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    Edith, that’s more an artifact of its being a pharmaceutical commercial than anything they’re trying to say or present with the commercial. The company is required to state certain things (the side effects, for example) along with their ad. All of them opt for a quickly-spoken (or tiny-fonted) run-through.

    However, your comment includes another idea for why it’s the “emotional” side of the woman who discovers this breakthrough of science, instead of the “rational.” That’s probably not their intent, but it could certainly be seen.

  7. Posted July 13, 2008 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    This is on par with Lil’ Wayne singing that menstruation is a venereal disease in “lollipop.”

  8. kayte
    Posted July 13, 2008 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    i believe that the marketing department that creates the commercials for this company is half braindead anyway, because they also produced a commercial for this pill using the musical selection “we’re not gonna take it.”

2 Trackbacks

  1. By Gender Policing Hurts Kids « Atlanta Academic on July 17, 2008 at 11:29 pm

    [...] femininity with frivolousness, and we might be teaching boys a form of subtle misogyny as well. As Sociological Images notes, “unlike men, who are supposed to reject all things feminine, women are encouraged to balance [...]

  2. By Feministe » Gender Policing Hurts Kids on July 18, 2008 at 8:55 am

    [...] femininity with frivolousness, and we might be teaching boys a form of subtle misogyny as well. As Sociological Images notes, “unlike men, who are supposed to reject all things feminine, women are encouraged to balance [...]

Post a Comment