The D.C. Council’s Committee on Health released a report after surveying D.C. high school students about sex education (discovered via Feministing). One of their questions was about the source of sexual health information. The pie chart below shows that students name, in order, their parents or guardians, health workers, teachers, friends, and boyfriends or girlfriends as the most common sources of information.
I asked a similar question in a study I did with college students, though I asked about knowledge about the clitoris specifically (more on that below). The figure below shows that the college students in my sample rated their friends, secondary school teachers, books, their sexual partners, and the mass media as their most important sources. Men also reported that pornography was an important source of knowledge. Very few students counted parents among their most valued sources. (Significance indicators are for sex difference.)
My co-authors and I were interested in how those sources correlated with actual knowledge, specifically knowledge about the clitoris. And so we gave them a test and compared their scores to their reported sources of knowledge. The table below is a regression showing which sources of knowledge were most predictive of a high score on the actual test. The findings were interesting: only two sources predicted significantly higher scores on the test: media (for men and women) and self-exploration (for women).
So, only one of the most frequently used sources of information, media, actually translated into real knowledge. Tapping into the rest–friends, secondary school teachers, books, their sexual partners–did not predict actual knowledge. Ironically, the best source of information for women, their own bodies, was among the least often cited source of information for women, beating out only pornography and parents.
This puts the D.C. study into some perspective. The high school students in that study reported that their parents or guardians, health workers, teachers, friends, and boyfriends or girlfriends were sources of sexual information, but that doesn’t mean that they are. And my findings suggest that they very well may not be.
Also see my findings (from the same paper) on the correlation (or lack thereof) between knowledge about the clitoris and orgasm for women.
The paper, titled “The Incidental Orgasm: The Presence of Clitoral Knowledge and the Absence of Orgasm for Women,” was co-authored with Emily Kremer and Jessica Brown and published in Women & Health (2005). If you’d like a copy, feel free to request one at socimages@contexts.org.




